Live GEO Monitor — Updated Monthly

We track our own GEO score

We use the same GEO Monitor product we sell on our own domain. This is a live report — not a screenshot, not a demo. Real data, updated every month.

Domain: aeolift.zeabur.app  ·  Baseline: March 19, 2026

GEO Monitor Report
aeolift.zeabur.app
76 /100
Good — Baseline Established
Technical GEO
100/100
Content Citability
51/100
Last scanned March 19, 2026  ·  Next check: April 1, 2026

Full transparency: This report was generated by our own GEO Monitor product running our citability_scorer.py and HTTP signal checks against aeolift.zeabur.app. Scores are real — not cherry-picked. We're showing you our gaps too.

Technical GEO — 100/100

All technical signals passing

The foundation of GEO is making sure AI crawlers can access, parse, and trust your content. We pass every check.

AI crawlers allowed
robots.txt explicitly permits GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended, and 6 other AI crawlers.
llms.txt present
/llms.txt exists with service descriptions, key facts, and contact info formatted for AI model consumption.
Schema markup
5 JSON-LD blocks on the homepage. Organization, Service, FAQ, Offer, and BreadcrumbList schemas all present.
Author signals
Byline and author attribution signals detected — improves source trustworthiness for AI citation ranking.
Date / freshness signals
datePublished and dateModified fields present in schema — signals content recency to AI retrieval systems.
Content Citability — 51/100

Moderate — room to improve

16 content blocks analyzed. Strong FAQ content is pulling up the score; short CTA sections drag it down. This is typical for marketing sites.

A
0 Excellent
B
3 Good
C
8 Moderate
D
3 Below avg
F
2 Poor
Top 3 citable content blocks
74
What is Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)?
81 words · Grade B · Strong answer-block structure, statistical density, self-containment
70
How do I get my website cited by ChatGPT and Perplexity?
90 words · Grade B · Clear numbered steps, high structural readability
69
How does Perplexity decide which sources to cite?
110 words · Grade B · High self-containment, good structural readability
GEO fixes in progress

What the monitor flagged — what we're doing about it

A GEO Monitor report isn't just scores — it shows you what to fix. Here are our top 3 issues from the March baseline.

  • No A-grade content blocks (0/16)
    Our best content hits B (74/100) but hasn't crossed into A territory. Fix: adding uniqueness signals — proprietary data, original statistics, and expert-only insights that can't be found elsewhere. Target: 3+ A-grade blocks by April.
  • 5 below-average CTA and hero blocks
    Marketing copy ("Reserve your spot", "Let's get your site cited") is scoring F because it's short, promotional, and non-informational. Fix: embedding stat hooks and one-sentence factual anchors even in short hero/CTA sections.
  • Optimal-length passages: 0/16
    None of our blocks hit the 75–150 word sweet spot for AI citation chunks. Most are either too short (CTAs) or too long (service explanations). Fix: restructuring body content into discrete, self-contained 80–120 word answer blocks.
Monitoring history

Score over time

We update this page every month with fresh monitor results. First month of data — more to come.

March 19, 2026 — Baseline
76/100 — Good (Technical 100, Content 51)
Initial scan. Strong technical GEO fundamentals. Content citability improved from 51 → 74 after FAQ block rewrites and uniqueness signal additions.
April 1, 2026 — Upcoming
Next monthly check
Target: 3+ A-grade content blocks, citability score >60. Report will be published here.

Track your own GEO score

Monthly re-scan + AI citation checks. Know if your fixes are holding. Watch $49/mo or Monitor Pro $99/mo.

Start with a free audit Get GEO Monitor →