Lily Ray — one of the most-followed voices in SEO, with 115,000 followers — posted a warning this week that most of the GEO industry needs to hear:
“One of the worst things you can do for AI search visibility? Destroying your SEO performance with shiny new AI search tactics that are ultimately dangerous for SEO — and by extension — AI search.”
She’s right. And the industry should listen.
The GEO space is splitting fast: on one side, providers that help brands become genuinely citable by AI engines; on the other, providers selling tactics that look like quick wins but quietly undermine the SEO foundation those AI wins depend on.
Here’s how to tell them apart — and what GEORaiser does differently.
The Three Dangerous GEO Tactics Lily Ray Is Warning About
The fastest-growing GEO tactic involves publishing articles in the format “Top 10 tools for [category]” — with your own product at the top. The theory: AI engines train on web content, and if enough “best of” lists mention you, you’ll appear in AI recommendations.
The problem: Google already identifies and discounts self-promotional listicle patterns. Its spam policies specifically target “content that appears to exist primarily to promote a product or service.” Publishers who flood the web with these articles — whether through their own site, partner networks, or content farms — are building AI visibility on a foundation that Google is actively working to penalize.
And if you lose organic search traffic, you lose the crawled content that feeds AI engines in the first place. It’s a fast path to invisible everywhere.
Another common tactic: publish high volumes of AI-generated content targeting every “What is…” and “Best…” query in your category. Volume as a GEO strategy.
Lily Ray flagged this directly: spammy AI content tactics could result in exclusion from future LLM training data. AI platforms — including OpenAI and Google — are updating their content intake policies specifically to identify and discount low-quality, machine-generated content signals. The brands flooding their content properties with AI content today are gambling that this window stays open. It won’t.
The most ethically compromised category: tools that identify Reddit threads, Quora discussions, and Facebook posts that AI models are drawing from — then post on your behalf using networks of fake, aged, high-karma accounts.
CrowdReply, one of the more prominent vendors in this space, explicitly describes this as their core product: “persona-based accounts” that comment in communities with sub-5% removal rates as a feature claim. This approach treats AI visibility as an influence operation problem. The risks are real: Trustpilot removed CrowdReply’s profile for guideline violations; Reddit and Quora actively ban these account networks; and regulatory pressure on AI manipulation is increasing. When a fake account network collapses, your AI visibility collapses with it overnight.
Why This Matters More Than It Seems
The core issue Lily Ray identified is systemic: most GEO tactics treat AI search as separate from SEO, when they’re actually interdependent.
AI engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google’s AI Overviews pull from web content — primarily from authoritative pages that Google already ranks, from high-quality sources AI platforms have indexed, and from the same trusted content ecosystems that power traditional search. Tactics that harm your standing with Google harm your AI visibility too.
The brands that will win in AI search long-term are the brands with genuine authority, accurate content, and real citations. Not the ones with the most listicles or the most Reddit comments from fake accounts.
What SEO-Safe GEO Actually Looks Like
The distinction isn’t complicated:
| SEO-Safe GEO (GEORaiser) | Dangerous GEO |
|---|---|
| Diagnoses why AI can’t cite your existing content | Creates new content regardless of whether the foundation is sound |
| Fixes technical crawlability (JS rendering, robots.txt, llms.txt) | Focuses only on off-site signals while your site remains invisible to AI crawlers |
| Structures real, verified information for machine readability | Produces self-promotional listicles designed to manipulate rankings |
| Builds genuine citations in credible publications | Injects fake mentions via persona-based account networks |
| Works only with factually accurate claims | Optimizes for volume, not accuracy |
| Every change survives a Google manual review | Depends on tactics Google is actively penalizing |
GEORaiser’s approach: every engagement starts with an audit. We read your existing content, find where accurate information about your business isn’t reaching AI engines, and fix the structural reasons for that. We don’t manufacture social proof. We don’t flood the web with templated content. We don’t use account networks to inject your brand into community discussions.
Questions to Ask Any GEO Provider
Before you engage a GEO provider, ask:
- Do you create or place content that doesn’t originate from my own business? If yes, ask where. If they describe any form of network placement without your editorial review, that’s a warning sign.
- How do you build brand mentions? “We earn them through content worth citing” and “We place them via managed account networks” are very different answers.
- What happens if Google penalizes your methods? If their approach depends on tactics currently in Google’s crosshairs, your investment disappears when the update ships.
- Can everything you do for me be shown to a journalist? Ethical GEO has nothing to hide. Black-hat GEO does.
The GEORaiser Position
We entered this space because the AI visibility problem is real and the solution most providers are selling is dangerous. Lily Ray’s warning isn’t an edge-case critique — it’s a description of the dominant practices in a fast-moving industry.
GEORaiser is built around one principle: accurate information that deserves to be found should be easy for AI engines to find. That’s it. We optimize the technical accessibility of your real content, help you earn genuine citations, and structure what’s already true about your business so AI can represent it correctly.
If your current GEO strategy involves anything that wouldn’t survive a Google spam review, you should stop and audit your foundation before the next algorithm update does it for you.
Get a Second Opinion on Your GEO Strategy
We audit your technical setup, content structure, and citation signals — and flag anything that could hurt your SEO while chasing AI visibility.
Get Free GEO Audit →